Cases 71 - 80 of 67,563
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Goldstein v. ONSite Service Corporation
as 1:2024cv11295
Plaintiff:
Nathan P. Goldstein
Defendant:
ONSite Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
August Image LLC v. The Nest Real Estate Agency LLC
as 1:2024cv11302
Plaintiff:
August Image LLC
Defendant:
The Nest Real Estate Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Los Agaves Grill, Inc. v. Los Agaves, LLC
as 4:2024cv40049
Plaintiff:
Los Agaves Grill, Inc.
Defendant:
Los Agaves, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Lane v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv11271
Defendant:
Charles D Baker, Charlie Baker, Barbara McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Wu et al
as 1:2024cv11273
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Michelle Wu, Brittany Vo, London Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Collins et al
as 1:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Nick Collins, Nick Collins' Son, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Walsh et al
as 1:2024cv11275
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Martin Joseph Walsh, Joan Marie Duffy, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
