Cases 1 - 10 of 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sandsbury v. Teers et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Eugene Sandsbury
Defendant:
John Teers and D.C.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foster v. USA
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
John Foster
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Harp et al v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Colton Harp, Tamra Marie Harp, Ray Tillotson and others
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1071 Higher Education Act 1965
Ceasar v. NH Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ceasar
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, NH Department of Corrections, Medical Department, Celia Englander and others
Other:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waugh v. Bishop & Buddha et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Nancy Waugh
Defendant:
Bishop & Buddha, The Horrocks Company, Amazon.com Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Demos v. Trump
as 1:2024fp00014
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
