Cases 1 - 6 of 6
The State of Mississippi v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv12063
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi, The State of Mississippi and The State of Mississippi
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
Not Classified By Court:
PURDUE PHARMA COMPANY, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BEN VENUE LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH VANDERWAL, VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
State of California et al v. John Sedor et al
as 1:2008mc00040
Plaintiff:
State of California and Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc.
Respondent:
John Sedor
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Amgen, Inc. and others
In Re: State of Iowa Cases
as 1:2007cv12141
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, State of Iowa, State of Iowa and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alpharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
State of Ohio v. Dey Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10270
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, State of Ohio, State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
Dey Inc., Dey Inc., Warrick Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10158
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
