Cases 1 - 6 of 6
The State of Mississippi v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv12063
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi, The State of Mississippi and The State of Mississippi
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
Not Classified By Court:
PURDUE PHARMA COMPANY, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BEN VENUE LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH VANDERWAL, VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
State of California et al v. John Sedor et al
as 1:2008mc00040
Plaintiff:
State of California and Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc.
Respondent:
John Sedor
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Amgen, Inc. and others
Oswego, County of v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10271
Plaintiff:
Oswego, County of
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
The County of Erie v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10282
Plaintiff:
The County of Erie and The County of Erie
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
County of Schenectady v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10273
Plaintiff:
County of Schenectady
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
