Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Coach, Inc. et al v. Sapatis et al
as 1:2012cv00506
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc. and Coach, Inc.
Defendant:
Londonderry Marketplace, LLC and Peter J. Sapatis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
COACH INC et al v. GILES et al
as 2:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
COACH INC and COACH SERVICES INC
Defendant:
CONSTANCE A GILES, JAMES J BERNARD, BRIAN L MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Coach, Inc. et al v. Debbi's Tanning & Boutique et al
as 1:2012cv10455
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Debbi's Tanning & Boutique and Deborah H Milliken
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Norcross v. City of Methuen et al
as 1:2011cv10154
Plaintiff:
Owen Norcross
Defendant:
City of Methuen , Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc. , Robert Jalbert and others
Cross_claimant:
Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc. and City of Methuen
Cross_defendant:
City of Methuen and Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Coach, Inc. et al v. Global Cellular et al
as 1:2010cv11887
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Cellular and Ray Lucas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Coach, Inc. et al v. Gata Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc. and Coach, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1- 20, Gata Corporation and Martin Taylor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Bebe Studio, Inc. et al v. Grand Stores et al
as 3:2008cv01478
Plaintiff:
Bebe Studio, Inc., Chanel, Inc., Coach Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Grand Stores, Centro Import, Bling-Bling and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bebe Studio, Inc. et al v. Zakkos et al
as 3:2008cv01462
Plaintiff:
Bebe Studio, Inc., Bebe Studio, Inc., Bebe Studio, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Zakkos, The Outlet by Zakkos Plata, JM Distributors and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
