Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff: CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 24-1038
Plaintiff: EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant: BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-2061
Plaintiff: EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant: BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-1806
Plaintiff / Appellant: EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant / Appellee: BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Czekalski v. Hanks, et al
as 23-1561
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON A. CZEKALSKI
Defendant / Appellee: HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections, in both her individual and official capacities, JAMES DALY, Chaplain, New Hampshire State Prison, in both his individual and official capacities and JAMES DALY, Chaplain, New Hampshire State Prison for Men, in both his individual and official capacities
Pace v. Mass DOC, et al
as 23-1364
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDRE PACE
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JUSTIN SALAMONE, Correctional Officer, MATTHEW H. VALADE, Correctional Officer and others
Defendant: THOMAS A. TURCO, III, Former Commissioner of The Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner of The Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, STEVEN SILVA, Former Superintendent of The Souza Baranowski Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacities and others
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff: ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant: RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
Holloway v. Hanks
as 22-1931
Petitioner / Appellant: DALE E. HOLLOWAY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff: ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant: RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
Perfetto v. Hanks
as 22-1487
Petitioner / Appellant: JONATHAN ANDREW PERFETTO
Respondent / Appellee: HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?