Cases 1 - 10 of 517
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
EARLES v. SAGADAHOC COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES #1-5, SAGADAHOC COUNTY, WILLIAM FRITH and others
Plaintiff:
LATOYA EARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEDERAL LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. HALEY
as 2:2024cv00288
Defendant:
JOHN HALEY
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROSS v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Defendant:
JOHN C NIVISON, BRYCE TORRENSON, ANDREW MCCORMACK and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARDEN v. BLAUVELT et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Defendant:
DOUG BLAUVELT, FRANKLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and JOHN COLEMAN
Plaintiff:
ELLIOTT L BARDEN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv00253
Defendant:
TROY MORTON, JOHN DOES 1 - 4 and PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
HALE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
JOHN HALE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CRANDALL v. KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHN CRANDALL
Defendant:
KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and PENOBSCOT COMMUNITY HEALTH AND COUNSELING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
