Cases 1 - 10 of 28
In the matter of Jorge Rodriguez Owner of M/Y Vitamin Sea
as 1:2020cv11697
In Re:
Jorge Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
US v. Rodriguez-Andino
as 19-1607
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE RODRIGUEZ-ANDINO
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Gonzalez
as 19-1461
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
RUBEN GONZALEZ, a/k/a Carlos Arnaldo Delgado Torres, a/k/a Rodriguez, a/k/a Luis Colon, a/k/a Jorge Rodriguez
Finance of America Reverse, LLC v. Jorge-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2016cv02983
Plaintiff:
Finance of America Reverse, LLC
Defendant:
Alejandro Jorge-Rodriguez, Ana Lydia Rivera-Nieves, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Hernandez-Vega
as 16-1083
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS L. HERNANDEZ-VEGA, a/k/a Carlos Peca
Interested Party:
JORGE RODRIGUEZ and ALMA ENID MARTINEZ
US v. Quiros-Morales
as 15-2141
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDGARDO QUIROS-MORALES, a/k/a Sealed Defendant 8, a/k/a Quirito
Interested Party:
JORGE RODRIGUEZ and ALMA ENID MARTINEZ
Sanchez-Villafae v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2015cv02190
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, DeWayne Hamlin, Antonio Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez-Villafae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez-Alcazar v. Allied Waste of Ponce, Inc., et al
as 3:2014cv01261
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez-Alcazar
Defendant:
Allied Waste of Ponce, Inc. , BFI of Ponce, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Popular Securities, Inc. et al v. Colon et al
as 3:2012cv02011
Plaintiff:
Popular Securities, Inc. , Kyrsis Marrero , Jorge Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Jose F. Colon and Ida Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
