Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Scott v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company NA
as 1:2024cv11614
Plaintiff: Michael David Scott
Defendant: The Bank of NY Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Scott et al v. US Bank National Association
as 1:2022cv11744
Plaintiff: Michael David Scott and EUNICE JAMES-SCOTT
Defendant: US Bank National Association, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2004-AR7 (U.S. Bank), US Bank National Association and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Scott v. US
as 21-1420
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Scott v. Citigroup Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10753
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and Citibank N.A.
Plaintiff: Michael D. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. US
as 20-1898
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Scott v. US Bank National Association
as 1:2020cv10372
Defendant: US Bank National Association
Plaintiff: Michael D. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Wild et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv40151
Plaintiff: Michael David Scott
Defendant: Ann Ragosta, Victor A. Wild, Matthew Galas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Scott
as 19-1506
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Interested Party: SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
In Re: Scott
as 19-1701
Respondent: UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
In Re: Scott
as 19-1160
Respondent: UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?