Cases 1 - 10 of 10
White v. CADKEY Corporation, et al
as 19-2200
Defendant / Appellee:
KUBOTEK USA, INC., CADKEY CORPORATION and KUBOTEK CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WHITE
White v. CADKEY Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv40097
Plaintiff:
Robert White
Defendant:
CADKEY Corporation, Kubotek Corporation and Kubotek USA corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
White v. CADKEY Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv40097
Plaintiff:
Robert White
Defendant:
CADKEY Corporation, Kubotek Corporation and Kubotek USA corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1200
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11828
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
White v. One World Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10011
Plaintiff:
Glenn Robert White
Defendant:
One World Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
USA v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00075
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company Inc., Petters Group Worldwide LLC and others
Receiver:
Douglas A. Kelley
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00090
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Deanna Coleman, Robert White and others
Receiver:
Douglas A. Kelley
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc10289
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Deanna Coleman, Robert White and others
Receiver:
Douglas A. Kelley
USA v. PETTERS et al
as 2:2008mc00163
Defendant:
THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS, PETTERS CO INC, PCI and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Receiver:
DOUGLAS A KELLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
