Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Quintana v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10216
Plaintiff:
Aaron W Quintana
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Courtney Roosevelt, Lida Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Shamorodian v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12210
Plaintiff:
Lida Shamorodian
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ajaryan, et al. v. Fresenius USA Inc., et al.
as 1:2014cv13338
Plaintiff:
Anait Ajaryan, Anahid Akhaian, Joe Apikian and others
Defendant:
Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Ruano-Ramirez
as 3:2013cv01948
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Lida E. Ruano-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Gomez v. Navaez, et al
as 12-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLIANA DOE, individually and as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico, REBECCA NARVAEZ, individually and as a Deputy Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, LIDA ISIS EGELE, individually and as a Deputy Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and others
In re: Gomez
as 12-1227
Petitioner:
In re: LOUIS GOMEZ
Respondent:
REBECCA NARVAEZ, individually and as a Deputy Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, LIDA ISIS EGELE, individually and as a Deputy Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Gomez v. Narvaez et al
as 3:2011cv01638
Plaintiff:
Louis Gomez
Defendant:
Rebecca Narvaez, Lida Isis Egele and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
