Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Jackson v. McCollum
as 14-6175
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH MACASTLE JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TRACY MCCOLLUM, Warden
Berryhill v. President of OK City N.A.A.C.P, et al
as 14-6139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT OF OKLAHOMA CITY N.A.A.C.P., VICKI MILES-LAGRANGE, District Director, ROZIA MARIE MCKINNEY-FOSTER and others
Berryhill v. United States, et al
as 14-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Arney, et al v. Hayden, et al
as 14-3107
Plaintiff:
RICKEY RAY REDFORD, ROBERT DEMASS, THOMAS H. PORTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND ROBERTS, CHARLES E. SIMMONS and BILL GRAVES
Movant To Intervene:
THOMAS ODELL KELLY and KENNETH JACKSON
Movant To Intervene - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LEEK
Jackson v. Trammell
as 14-5041
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT EARL JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden
Armbeck v. City and County of Denver, et al
as 13-1487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA ARMBECK, on behalf of KENNETH ARMBECK, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, JOHN W. SAMPSON, individually and as Officer, # 00-86, in his official capacity, JACKSON, individually and as Officer, in his official capacity and others
Jackson v. Martin
as 13-6240
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL C. JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY MARTIN, Warden
Jackson v. Trammell
as 13-5119
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHELTON JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL
Jackson v. NM Dep. of Corr. Prob & Parole, et al
as 13-2140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRIGINAL D. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PROBATION AND PAROLE and NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Seader v. Storey, et al
as 13-1295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON SEADER
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT STOREY, THOMAS JACKSON and AMY RUPPECK, ;JOHN DOE; JANE DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
