Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Eaves v. Kory, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff: RODNEY DOUGLAS EAVES
Defendant: MS. KORY, JERRY ROARK, DANNY SALAZAR and others
Jarvis v. Weston County Detention Center, et al
as 23-8063
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANNY JARVIS
Defendant / Appellee: WESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CORPORAL JASON JENKINS, in his official capacity, OFFICER LARAMIE, in his official capacity and others
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4055
Plaintiff / Appellant: LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
Daniels v. USAO UT Dist, et al
as 23-4049
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANNY LYNN DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee: USAO UT DIST, ANGELA MARIE REDDISH-DAY, UNITED STATES PROBATION FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH and others
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4006
Plaintiff / Appellant: LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
United States v. Daniels
as 22-4084
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANNY LYNN DANIELS
Parks v. Taylor, et al
as 22-6085
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALLEN ALEXANDER PARKS
Defendant / Appellee: SHERIFF P. D. TAYLOR, DANNY HONEYCUTT, General Counsel, Individually, ROBERT BENJAMIN, Lieutenant, Individually and others
Waterman v. Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, Kansas, et al
as 22-3052
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant / Appellee: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHEROKEE COUNTY, KANSAS, CURTIS NIDA, Sergeant, in his individual capacity, NATHAN DAVIS, Jailer, in his individual capacity and others
Waterman v. Groves, et al
as 22-3042
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID M. GROVES, MICHELLE TIPPIE, DANNY DAVIS and others
Campbell v. Bear
as 17-6091
Petitioner - Appellant: DANNY R. CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee: CARL BEAR, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?