Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Hunter v. King, et al
as 24-1210
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER
Defendant:
ALEXIS KING, District Attorney for the 1st Judicial District, in her official capacity, CHRIS SCHAFFER, Director of the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, CHIEF SMITH, Chief of Police for the Lakewood Police Department, in his individual capacity and others
King v. Rogers
as 23-6142
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLAYTON ORVILLE KING
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID ROGERS
King v. Ciolli
as 23-1201
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC KING
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden, Florence FCC and ADX, United States Bureau of Prisons
King v. Harpe
as 23-5041
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE KING
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN HARPE, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
United States v. King
as 23-5031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT PATRICK KING
Glasser v. King, et al
as 17-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE GLASSER
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROL KING, RN and MICHAEL WALSH, PA
Defendant:
JAMES HARDING and MICHAEL HANSA, Deceased, through surviving spouse and successor, Weera-Anong Hansa
Miller v. Ford, et al
as 16-6289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REJEANIA LOUISE MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY FORD, JACQUELINE GARRETT-KING, RICKEY W. MOHAM, Warden presiding in lieu of previous Warden and others
O'Neill v. King, et al
as 16-2080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL O'NEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY KING, New Mexico Attorney General, NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, NEW MEXICO PAROLE BOARD and others
King v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 16-8013
Petitioner - Appellant:
LASHAWN KING
Respondent - Appellee:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL and STATE OF WYOMING
Cain, et al v. Aragon, et al
as 15-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CAIN
Plaintiff:
RALPH MAESTAS, STEVEN PIKE, MATTHEW COX and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN ARAGON, E. BRAVO, R. ULIBARRI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
