Cases 101 - 110 of 140
Morris v. Tulsa Police Department, et al
as 11-5108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. LAWLESS, S. JONES, C. LAGRONE and others
Defendant:
TULSA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Morris v. Noe, et al
as 11-5066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNA MORRIS, individually and as Next friend of William Morris, III
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMIE NOE
Defendant:
CITY OF SAPULPA
Fournerat v. Henry, et al
as 11-6085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE MORRIS FOURNERAT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HENRY, in his individual capacity, MARY BECK BRISCOE, in her individual capacity, MONROE G. MCKAY, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kastner v. Guenther, et al
as 11-3002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER, individually, as Representative of the Estate of Jessie I. Brooks and as beneficiary of Jessie I. Brooks trust
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT I. GUENTHER, individually and as President, Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock and Kennedy and MORRIS, LAING, EVANS, BROCK AND KENNEDY, CHARTERED, a Professional Association
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Werholtz, et al
as 10-3302
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORRIS WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ and STEVE SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Morris, et al v. OK Depart. of Human Services, et al
as 10-6241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY MORRIS and GLENDA MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, State of Oklahoma, HOWARD H. HENDRICK, Director of Oklahoma Department of Human Services, OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. and others
Edwards-Flynn v. Yara, et al
as 10-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET D. EDWARDS-FLYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL ANN YARA, MATTHEW SANDOVAL, HENRY O. SANCHEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
