Cases 11 - 20 of 171
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 22-7024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Walker v. Douglas County, Kansas, Board of County Commission, et al
as 22-3085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT LEE WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, (FNU) ORMSBY, (FNU) BLUE and others
United States v. Walker
as 22-5005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMANDA LYN WALKER
Folsom v. Walker, et al
as 22-6009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN FOLSOM
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL WALKER, LINDSAY MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL, NORTH FORK CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-3237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-1442
Plaintiff:
KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant:
MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant:
GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-1394
Plaintiff:
KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant:
MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant:
GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
Walker v. State of Kansas
as 21-3137
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARNEST EUGENE WALKER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
