Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Powers v. Stancil
as 19-1067
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN JAY POWERS
Respondent / Appellee:
M.L. STANCIL
Cunningham, et al v. FBP
as 17-1054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD CUNNINGHAM
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAY POWERS, PERCY BARRON, ALPHONSO BLAKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cunningham, et al v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 17-1027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. POWERS
Plaintiff:
HAROLD CUNNINGHAM, PERCY BARRON, ALPHONSO BLAKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Powers v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 16-1490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JAY POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Brueningsen, et al v. Resort Express, et al
as 16-4198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRUENINGSEN, ALDIS BARSKETIS, STEVE SIMCHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RESORT EXPRESS, INC., PARK CITY TRANSPORTATION, INC. and PREMIER TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Utah Associated v. EPA, et al
as 16-9543
Petitioner:
UTAH ASSOCIATED MUNICIPAL POWER SYSTEM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cline v. Allred, et al
as 16-4070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PHILLIP E. ALLRED, DUSTIN ALLERD, PRESTON ALLRED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PACIFICORP, an Oregon corporation, DBA Rocky Mountain Power
Attorney - Appellant:
RUSSELL A. CLINE
Los Lobos Renewable Power, et al v. Americulture, et al
as 16-2046
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOS LOBOS RENEWABLE POWER, LLC and LIGHTNING DOCK GEOTHERMAL H1-01, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
AMERICULTURE, INC. and DAMON SEAWRIGHT
Coleto Creek Power v. EPA, et al
as 16-9511
Petitioner:
COLETO CREEK POWER, LP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY
NRG Texas Power v. EPA
as 16-9512
Petitioner:
NRG TEXAS POWER, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
