Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Tanner v. Mullin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-7098
Petitioner - Appellant: TWYLA TANNER
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE MULLIN, Warden
Vanderwerf, et al v. Smithkline Beecham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-3218
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEBRA VANDERWERF, Individually and as next friend for Riley Vanderwerf and Tanner Vanderwerf, Minors and ESTATE OF WILLIAM K. VANDERWERF
Defendant - Appellee: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, d/b/a Glaxosmithkline
Harvey-Burgin v. Sprint/United Management Compa
as 08-3103
Plaintiff: ELOIS BROOKS COTTON, CAROL S. POVOLISH, RICKY A. JORDAN and others
Defendant / Appellee: SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUBY J. HARVEY-BURGIN
Kirby v. Dallas County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD G. KIRBY
Defendant - Appellee: DALLAS COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT, Community Supervision and Corrections Department, Dallas Co., MARK OLSEN, D. TODD HILL, Probation Officer, Dallas County Probation Department and others
New England Health, et al v. Woodruff, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1482
Plaintiff - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, CLIFFORD MOSHER, TEJINDER SINGH and others
Defendant - Appellant: ROBERT S. WOODRUFF and JOSEPH P. NACCHIO
Defendant - Appellee: QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., DRAKE S. TEMPEST, JAMES A. SMITH and others
Defendant: ROBIN R. SZELIGA, GREGORY CASEY, MARK IWAN and others
Intervenor: CHARLES REINER and MARGARET M. FLANAGAN
Summum v. Duchesne City, et al
as 05-4168
Plaintiff - Appellee: SUMMUM, a corporate sole and church
Defendant - Appellant: DUCHESNE CITY, a governmental entity, CLINTON PARK, Mayor of Duchesne City, YORDYS NELSON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?