Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Faith Technologies, et al v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., et al
as 13-3008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FAITH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LITHKO CONTRACTING, INC., SUMMIT CONCRETE, LLC, as assignee of the claims of Larry Bair Excavating and others
Plaintiff:
MCCORKENDALE CONSTRUCTION, INC., SUPPLY NETWORK, INC., DBA Viking SupplyNet, D&D MASONRY, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND and BROWN COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, AKA Brown Commercial Construction Company
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company v. Tri-State Trucking, et al
as 12-4103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY, LLC, FKA Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LP, LLLP
Defendant Cross Claimant Cross-Defendant - Appellant:
TRI-STATE TRUCKING, LLC
Defendant Cross Claimant Cross-Defendant:
SUNLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. and MB CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Defendant Cross Claim Defendant:
MIKE BRADY CORPORATION
Continental Western Ins. v. Shay Construction, Inc., et al
as 11-1515
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
SHAY CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado corporation
Defendant:
MILENDER WHITE CONSTRUCTION CO., a Colorado corporation
Continental Western v. Milender White, et al
as 11-1516
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
MILENDER WHITE CONSTRUCTION CO., a Colorado corporation
Defendant:
SHAY CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado corporation
Continental Western v. Milender White, et al
as 11-1516
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
MILENDER WHITE CONSTRUCTION CO., a Colorado corporation
Defendant:
SHAY CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado corporation
Fisher Sand & Gravel, et al v. Giron, et al
as 11-2067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FISHER SAND AND GRAVEL, CO., DBA Southwest Asphalt Paving and FISHER SAND AND GRAVEL-NEW MEXICO, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY GIRON, individually and as former Cabinet Secretary of the New Mexico Department of Transportation and MAX VALERIO, individually and as former Deputy Secretary of the New Mexico Department of Transportation
Defendant:
FNF CONSTRUCTION, INC., PULICE CONSTRUCTION, INC., JED BILLINGS, Chief Executive Officer of FNF Construction, Inc. and others
Klen, et al v. City of Loveland, et al
as 10-1311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD J. KLEN
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J. KLEN, DIVERSE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado Corporation and HOLSTEIN SELF-SERVICE STORAGE, LLC, Organized under Colorado Law
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, a Colorado Municipal Corporation, THOMAS HAWKINSON, CITY OF LOVELAND BUILDING OFFICIAL, in his individual and official capacities, GREG GEORGE, CITY OF LOVELAND, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, in his individual and official capacities and others
United Rentals v. Genie Industries, et al
as 10-1303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC., ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, ARROWOOD SURPLUS COMPANY and others
BP Pipelines, et al v. C.D. Brown Construction, Inc.
as 10-5087
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BP PIPELINES (NORTH AMERICA) INC., a Maine corporation and CCPS TRANSPORTATION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant - Appellant:
C.D. BROWN CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Oklahoma corporation
Defendant:
SHIDLER TELEPHONE COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation
BP Pipelines, et al v. C.D. Brown Construction
as 09-5081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BP PIPELINES (NORTH AMERICA) INC., a Maine corporation and CCPS TRANSPORTATION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant:
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES, FKA BNC Environmental Services
Defendant-Cross-Claimant:
SHIDLER TELEPHONE COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation
Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff - Appellant:
C.D. BROWN CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Oklahoma corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
