Cases 21 - 30 of 179
Fawley v. Lea County Board of Commissioners, et al
as 22-2120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN W. FAWLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LEA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DANIELLE ROMERO, Court Clerk II, SANDY BODLE, Judicial Specialist Supervisor and others
Harris, et al v. Romero, et al
as 22-1113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUISE D. HARRIS
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ROMERO, JESSY AVENDANO, MARTINEZ, Sergeant and others
Harris, et al v. Romero, et al
as 22-1115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEDRICK HARRIS
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE D. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ROMERO, JESSY AVENDANO, MARTINEZ, Sergeant and others
United States v. Romero
as 22-3075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ROMERO
Cyeef-Din, et al v. Onken, et al
as 22-2037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDUL WAKIL CYEEF-DIN and QUAN TRAN
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS ONKEN, Rio Rancho Police Department Lieutenant, JAMES LA PORTE, Rio Rancho Police Department Sergeant, AARON BROWN, Rio Rancho Police Department Officer and others
United States v. Jimenez
as 22-5017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GERARDO BENITEZ JIMENEZ, AKA Gerardo Martinez-Jimenez, AKA Francisco Romero-Marte, AKA Felipe Damien Ulloa, AKA Javier Romero, AKA Antonio Benetes, AKA Carlos Gonzalez-Ulloa, AKA Damien Virgen-Perez, AKA Gerardo Benitez-Jimenez
Medina v. Williams, et al
as 21-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELANO MARCO MEDINA
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS and MIKE ROMERO
Than v. McKibbin, et al
as 21-1193
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE ROMERO, KEN TOPLISS, JODY BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONG THAN
Romero-Cardoso v. Garland
as 21-9549
Petitioner:
REMIGIO ROMERO-CARDOSO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Andrade-Romero v. Wilkinson
as 21-9520
Petitioner:
MARISOL ANDRADE-ROMERO
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
