Cases 31 - 40 of 697
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6117
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DAVID CULE, Warden
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOR T. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK KNUTSON, DAVID LOUTHAN, Warden and others
In re: Brooks
as 23-1247
Petitioner:
In re: BILL JOE BROOKS
Respondent:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 23-8052
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN, in his official capacity, AKA Seth Norris and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rigsby v. Corder, et al
as 23-7048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. CORDER, CPL. HAYES, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carter v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-8044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES KENZELL CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CLASSIFICATION AND HOUSING MANAGER, CARL VOIGTSBERGER, individually and others
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6085
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR, Deputy Director
Lynn v. Willnauer, et al
as 23-3111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLIE WILLNAUER, MARY YOAKUM, TONI SINCLAIR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-8040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
