Cases 31 - 40 of 694
Carter v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-8044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES KENZELL CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CLASSIFICATION AND HOUSING MANAGER, CARL VOIGTSBERGER, individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lynn v. Willnauer, et al
as 23-3111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLIE WILLNAUER, MARY YOAKUM, TONI SINCLAIR and others
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6085
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR, Deputy Director
Rigsby v. Corder, et al
as 23-7048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. CORDER, CPL. HAYES, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
In re: Brooks
as 23-1247
Petitioner:
In re: BILL JOE BROOKS
Respondent:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-8040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santistevan v. Williams, et al
as 23-1193
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO F. SANTISTEVAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director Colorado Department of Corrections and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6075
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR, Deputy Director
Rhodes v. Shannon, et al
as 23-8026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTY W. RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SHANNON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, EDDIE WILSON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Prison Administrator, SETH NORRIS, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Deputy Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
