Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 187
Mathieu v. Brown, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5061
Defendant / Appellee: ROGERS COUNTY COURT CLERK, MARK SCHANTZ, Rogers County Defense Attorney and AUSTIN BROWN, Oklahoma State Highway Patrol/Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES J. MATHIEU
In re: Ray
as 19-6044
Respondent: TRACY MCCOLLUM, Warden, Oklahoma State Reformatory and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Petitioner: In re: LANCEY DARNELL RAY
Tucker v. Office of Civil Rights, et al
as 19-6030
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARKEITH D. TUCKER
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS and SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
Glossip, et al v. Gross, et al
as 19-6002
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL W. ROACH, DIANNE B. OWENS, LAURA PITTMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALFRED B. MITCHELL, JOHN M. GRANT, BENJAMIN R. COLE, by and through his next friend Robert S. Jackson and others
Petitioner / Appellant: WADE LAY
Harris v. Royal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-6109
Petitioner - Appellant: JIMMY DEAN HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee: TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Malone v. Royal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-6027
Petitioner - Appellant: RICKY RAY MALONE
Respondent - Appellee: TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
In re: Stouffer
as 17-6016
Petitioner: BIGLER JOBE STOUFFER, II
Respondent: TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
In re: Postelle
as 17-6017
Petitioner: GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Respondent - Respondent: TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
In re: Hancock
as 17-6013
Petitioner: PHILLIP HANCOCK
Respondent: TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
In re: Ryder
as 17-7004
Petitioner: JAMES CHANDLER RYDER
Respondent: TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?