Cases 31 - 40 of 151
Morgan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6099
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Morgan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6088
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cunningham, et al v. FBP
as 17-1054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD CUNNINGHAM
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAY POWERS, PERCY BARRON, ALPHONSO BLAKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cunningham, et al v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 17-1027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. POWERS
Plaintiff:
HAROLD CUNNINGHAM, PERCY BARRON, ALPHONSO BLAKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Powers v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 16-1490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JAY POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Buhl v. Davis, et al
as 16-1390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE DAVIS, C. DANIELS, ANTHONY OSAGIE and others
Ellis v. Oliver, et al
as 16-1387
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAMON ELLIS
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN OLIVER, in his individual and official capacities
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID ALLRED, DO, in his individual and official capacities and others
Pinson, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL G. STINE and JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Plaintiff:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEBRA PAYNE and others
Pinson v. Pledger, et al
as 16-6272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU PLEDGER, FNU TOMLINSON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Wilson v. Cozza-Rhodes, et al
as 16-1024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TERESA K. COZZA-RHODES, M. RIOS, ERIC EARWIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
