Cases 71 - 80 of 1,695
Carlson, et al v. Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, et al
as 23-1095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS F. CARLSON and MAYA ZUBKOVSKAYA
Defendant / Appellee:
COLORADO CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, LLC, FERTILITY LABS OF COLORADO, LLC and ROBERT L. GUSTOFSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Womack v. Rodriguez
as 23-3047
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Z'IONTAE L. WOMACK, as administrator of the estate of Lionel A. Womack
Defendant / Appellant:
JEREMY RODRIGUEZ
Estate of Jon L. Bogue, et al v. Favre, et al
as 23-1077
Counter Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF JON L. BOGUE and VICKI L. MCCORKLE, the Executrix of the Estate of Jon L. Bogue
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ALAN FAVE and JOHN ALAN FAVRE
Counter Claimant:
PATRICK S. ADAMS, SHARON E. ADAMS, SINH T. LY and others
Kassel v. Attorney General State of Colorado
as 23-1059
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. KASSEL, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF COLORADO
Torgerson, et al v. LCC International
as 23-3039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD TORGERSON, ROBERT HALL, SHELLEY GORDON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Virginia corporation
Defendant:
KENNY YOUNG, BRIAN DUNN, REBECCA STAHL and others
United States v. Medeiros, et al
as 23-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
NICK L. MEDEIROS and BOBBY GREAVES
Ridley v. Williams
as 23-3028
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY EARL RIDLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS L. WILLIAMS
Babakr v. Fowles, et al
as 23-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUZAFAR BABAKR
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. JACOB T. FOWLES, DR. DOROTHY M. DALEY, DR. STEVEN W. MAYNARD-MOODY and others
Willoughby v. United States, et al
as 23-5013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE L. WILLOUGHBY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
