Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,127
United States v. Gulley
as 24-3078
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TEGAN C. GULLEY
Owen v. Powell
as 24-4065
Petitioner: SEAN C. OWEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF UTAH and ROBERT POWELL, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2083
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Luginbyhl v. Moore, et al
as 24-6102
Plaintiff: LEVI LUGINBYHL
Defendant: DARRELL L. MOORE, JUDGE PHILLIP C. CORLEY, CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, AKA Core Civic and others
Fucci, et al v. First American Title Insurance Company, et al
as 24-4051
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER C. FUCCI, an individual, AMBLESIDE PARK, a New Hampshire corporation, RICHARD HARDER, trustee of the Richard and Susan Harder Living Trust and others
Defendant: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, KIRSTEN PARKIN, an individual, WILLIAM BOWSER, an individual and others
Marshall v. Bacon, et al
as 24-2076
Plaintiff: VICTOR R. MARSHALL
Defendant: C. SHANNON BACON, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New Mexico, MIKE HAMMAN, State Engineer of the State of New Mexico, ROLF SCHMIDT-PETERSEN, Director of the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission and others
Thomas v. Tulsa County Sheriff, et al
as 24-5057
Plaintiff: BYRON C. THOMAS
Defendant: TULSA COUNTY SHERIFF, UNITED STATES MARSHALS, U.S. DEPUTY MARSHAL JOEY POFFEL and others
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant: GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Serpik v. Weedon, et al
as 24-6071
Plaintiff: ROMAN VLADIMIROVICH SERPIK, Article III man
Defendant: JILL WEEDON, individually and in her official capacity, GINA WEBB, individually and in her official capacity, ANGELA C. MARSEE, individually and in her official capacity and others
Pittman v. Pickett, et al
as 24-1153
Plaintiff: EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant: PICKETT, C/O, FONTEROT, C/O, PLATO, C/O and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?