Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Chang v. Rout, et al
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
MENG UOY CHANG
Defendant:
DAVID ROUT, HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC., MURPHY CENTER LLC and others
Murphy v. Schaible, et al
as 24-1156
Plaintiff:
DIANNA CHRISTINE MURPHY
Defendant:
THOMAS SCHAIBLE and SCHAIBLE, RUSSO & COMPANY, C.P.A.'S, L.L.P.
Murphy v. Cantex Continuing Care, et al
as 24-2021
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MURPHY, as Personal Representative of the wrongful death estate of Joe A. James
Defendant:
CANTEX CONTINUING CARE NETWORK LLC, CANTEX HEALTH CARE CENTERS III, LLC, MEDCARE MGMT. HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Medina v. Murphy, et al
as 24-1029
Plaintiff:
DELANO MEDINA
Defendant:
JENNIFER MURPHY, REBEKAH RYAN and JR HALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
Springer v. Seventh Judicial District Court, et al
as 23-2158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, MERCEDES MURPHY, SHANNON MURDOCK-POFF and others
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Murphy v. Powell
as 23-4118
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CHARLES MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ROBERT POWELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
