Cases 1 - 10 of 237
Randall v. Utah Board of Pardons & Parole
as 24-4069
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CHAD RANDALL
Defendant:
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE
Sladek v. Bank of America, NA, et al
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SLADEK
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, a North Carolina corporation, U.S. BANK, a Minnesota corporation, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, a Utah corporation and others
Konecny v. Cruise America, et al
as 24-1094
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, a/k/a Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
CRUISE AMERICA, INC., RVR, INC., RANDALL S. SMALLEY and others
Throneberry v. Nunn
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-6165
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDALL DUANE THRONEBERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN, Warden
Christensen v. Crow
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-6052
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN RANDALL CHRISTENSEN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Surat v. Klamser
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-1284
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAELLA LYNN SURAT
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDALL KLAMSER, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, a municipality
Cowen, et al v. Air Methods Corporation, et al
as 21-1233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHLEEN PENCE, RANDAL COWEN, LANA HUGHES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS LLC and AIR METHODS CORPORATION
United States v. Crockett
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-6072
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDALL CROCKETT, AKA Chip
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.