Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 313
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner: KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent: NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Marshall v. Bacon, et al
as 24-2076
Plaintiff: VICTOR R. MARSHALL
Defendant: C. SHANNON BACON, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New Mexico, MIKE HAMMAN, State Engineer of the State of New Mexico, ROLF SCHMIDT-PETERSEN, Director of the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission and others
Thompkins v. Santistevan, et al
as 24-2054
Petitioner: TERRICK L. THOMPKINS
Respondent: DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Bravo v. Attorney General of the State of New Mexico, et al
as 24-2034
Petitioner: SALVADOR BRAVO
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and OTERO COUNTY PRISON FACILITY
Maldonado v. Marthenz, et al
as 24-2032
Petitioner: STEVEN I. MALDONADO
Respondent: FNU MARTHENZ, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Skaggs v. Santistevan, et al
as 24-2011
Petitioner: JASON SKAGGS
Respondent: DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Garcia v. Rios, et al
as 23-2200
Petitioner: LOUIS GARCIA
Respondent: HECTOR RIOS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Ramirez v. Northeast New Mexico Detention Facility, et al
as 23-2195
Petitioner: LUIS RAMON RAMIREZ
Respondent: NORTHEAST NEW MEXICO DETENTION FACILITY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Blea v. Martinez, et al
as 23-2191
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH BLEA
Respondent / Appellee: RICHARD MARTINEZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Tovar-Mendoza v. Martinez, et al
as 23-2186
Petitioner / Appellant: CARLOS TOVAR-MENDOZA
Respondent / Appellee: RICHARDO MARTINEZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?