Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,477
United States v. Roark
as 24-5062
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LANCE D. ROARK
In re: Wilkins
as 24-6097
Petitioner: In re: JIMMIE D. WILKINS
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES
Fucci, et al v. First American Title Insurance Company, et al
as 24-4051
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER C. FUCCI, an individual, AMBLESIDE PARK, a New Hampshire corporation, RICHARD HARDER, trustee of the Richard and Susan Harder Living Trust and others
Defendant: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, KIRSTEN PARKIN, an individual, WILLIAM BOWSER, an individual and others
In re: Hyslop
as 24-7043
Petitioner: In re: LUTHER D. HYSLOP
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES
McClaflin v. Sanofi--Aventis U.S., et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff: GINA MCCLAFLIN
Defendant: SANOFI--AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI--AVENTIS U. S. LLC, d/b/a Winthrop U.S. and SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., f/k/a Sanofi--Aventis U.S., Inc
Lombardi v. Prosecution and Code Enforcement Office, et al
as 24-1183
Plaintiff: KIKI LOMBARDI, AKA K. Kiki Whitaker-Lombard
Defendant: PROSECUTION AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE, West Colfax, DENVER PROBATION AND CASES, Case Level at Probation, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner: GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent: M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner: GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent: A. CIOLLI, Warden, AW PROGRAMS COMPLEX, CMC COMPLEX and others
Goodwin v. CIR
as 24-9003
Petitioner: JENNIFER D. GOODWIN
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Sims v. City of Pueblo Housing Authy., et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff: LARRY D. SIMS
Defendant: CITY OF PUEBLO HOUSING AUTHY., PUEBLO MAYOR OFFICE, PUEBLO SHERIFF OFFICE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?