Cases 111 - 120 of 1,458
Harris v. McCurtain County Jail Trust et al
as 6:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Roper Harris
Defendant:
McCurtain County Jail Trust, McCurtain County Board of County Commissioners, Scott McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Marlatt v. Murray County Jail et al
as 6:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Marlatt
Defendant:
Murray County Jail, Murray County Board of County Commissioners, Darin Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Phillips v Rogers
as 6:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Charlie Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Walgreens et al
as 6:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson and Nehemiah H&G Construction
Defendant:
Walgreens, CVS, Rite-Aid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hammett v. Pontotoc County Sheriff et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Janice Hammett
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Sheriff and Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. James et al
as 6:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Jesse James, Jessica Brown, David Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McVicker v. Muskogee Housing Authority
as 6:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Rosemary McVicker
Defendant:
Muskogee Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Rahhal v. Okemah Pharmacy
as 6:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
Okemah Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
