Cases 81 - 90 of 2,008
Butler v. Bryning et al
as 6:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
David Bryning, Karen Hughes, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Jared M Trotter and Jared M. Trotter
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brauning v. Brooks et al
as 6:2023cv00349
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
Michael Brooks, Jared Strand, Shannon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Clair v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Michael St. Clair
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Oakes v. Merritt et al
as 6:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Oakes
Defendant:
Kevin Merritt, State of Oklahoma and Leflore County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrook v. Fallin et al
as 6:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Westbrook
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Craig Sutter, Kevin Stitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Attorney General, Pushmataha County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Woodward and Joseph Lee Woodard
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and Leflore County District Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
Christie Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Root v. USA
as 6:2023cv00322
Petitioner:
Levi Cody Root, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
