Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Payne v. Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv00407
Plaintiff:
James C. Payne
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Pittsburg County Jail , Pittsburg County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hess v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hess
Defendant:
Justin Jones, State of Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Rogers County, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hess v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv00313
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hess
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Rogers County, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Free v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
Wesley D. Free
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Jimmy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Department of Corrections - Oklahoma et al
as 6:2012cv00035
Petitioner:
Christopher Vickers
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Randall Workman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 6:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
Isaiya Andre Lewis
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Workman et al
as 6:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Randy Workman, Debbie Morton, Chad Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Hand et al
as 6:2011cv00345
Plaintiff:
John H. May
Defendant:
Joyand Hand, Ronald Anderson and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. IHCC, et al.,
as 6:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gray
Defendant:
IHCC D&E Unit 1 Doc and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Tiger et al
as 6:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Gary Wallace
Defendant:
Ryan Tiger and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
