Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Whitecap Natural Gas Services LLC v. Coxcom LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Whitecap Natural Gas Services LLC
Defendant:
Coxcom LLC and Cox Oklahoma Telecom LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kemp v. Cox et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Nancy Elizabeth Kemp
Defendant:
Preston Cox, Tim Tipton and Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Low v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Darrell Low
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and Cox Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cox v. McCarthy
as 5:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Yasin Cox
Defendant:
Randall K McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cox et al v. TJ Inspection Inc
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Shawn Cox
Defendant:
TJ Inspection Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cox v. Camfil USA et al
as 5:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Yasin Cox
Defendant:
Camfil USA, Lynne Laake, Keith Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cox v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Brandi Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
