Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 64
State of Oklahoma v. HHS, et al
as 24-6063
Plaintiff: STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY OF, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Augustine-Adams v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 2:2023cv00916
Plaintiff: Kif Augustine-Adams
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Oklahoma State of v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2023cv01052
Plaintiff: Oklahoma State of
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Jessica S Marcella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Augustine-Adams v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 2:2022cv00451
Plaintiff: Kif Augustine-Adams
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Sanderson v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02206
Plaintiff: Kenneth A. Sanderson
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Becerra
as 22-4012
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDA P. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Chinn v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02662
Plaintiff: Henry Chinn, Jr.
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary of and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Denver Bible Church, et al v. Azar, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1391
Defendant / Appellee: STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury, CHAD W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH, DENVER BIBLE CHURCH, ROBERT A. ENYART and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Denver Bible Church, et al v. Azar, et al
as 20-1377
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, CHAD W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ROBERT A. ENYART, JOEY RHOADS, COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellant: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, GOVERNOR JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor, State of Colorado and JILL HUNSAKER RYAN, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Amicus Curiae: INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, COVENANT NETWORK OF PRESBYTERIANS, EQUAL PARTNERS IN FAITH and others
Lystn, LLCv. Food and Drug Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01943
Defendant: Colorado Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Administration, Laurel (I) Hamling and others
Plaintiff: Lystn, LLC and Lystn, LLC doing business as Answers Pet Food
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?