Cases 51 - 60 of 9,239
King v. United States et al
as 5:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Clayton Orville King
Defendant:
United States, Communications Federal Credit Union and Resolute Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Naifeh et al
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Idalys Torres Rivera
Counter Claimant:
Charo Naifeh
Defendant:
Casa Light Realty, LLC and Platinum Investment Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Poindexter v. Haskell, Town of et al
as 6:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Poindexter
Defendant:
Haskell, Town of, Steve Arrowood, Jessica Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatcher v. Yang et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hatcher
Defendant:
Sylvain Yang and Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Clark Harmon
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Gentner Drummond and Nowata County, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
