Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 49,549
McKinney v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Jester Cole McKinney
Defendant: Kyle Waters, Stacy Slaughter and Sequoyah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner: DeMaurea Davis
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Wright
as 5:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Smith
Defendant: FNU Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant: Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes v. Harpe
as 24-6094
Petitioner: PEDRO PABLO FUENTES
Respondent: STEVEN HARPE
Brown v. Lane
as 5:2024cv00285
Petitioner: Curtis Tyrone Brown
Respondent: Reece Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Drummond
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner: Thomas Allen Moore
Respondent: Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beach v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Defendant: Wyoming Governor, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Deputy Administrator and others
Plaintiff: Jesse Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner: John Miguel Swan
Respondent: Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christensen v. Amonson et al
as 5:2024cv00479
Plaintiff: John E Christensen
Defendant: Chris Amonson and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?