Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 49,753
Jones v. Stephens County Jail
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff: Dominic R Jones
Defendant: Stephens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Smith
as 24-4066
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MARLON ALONZO SMITH
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner: Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent: William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christensen et al v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00562
Plaintiff: John Christensen and Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant: Chris Anderson, Under Sheriff and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Draine
as 24-6111
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TIAHMO LENELL DRAINE
Cunningham v. State of Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00945
Plaintiff: Ernest Cunningham
Defendant: State of Colorado Department of Corrections, Stephen (I) Montoya, Stephen Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff: MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant: CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, C.S.P.D. Officer and others
Berry v. Louthan
as 24-5069
Petitioner: STACEY D. BERRY
Respondent: DAVID LOUTHAN, Warden
Farrow v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1239
Petitioner: MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner: VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent: TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?