Cases 51 - 60 of 49,549
Spencer (ID 126729) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Michaela Lea Spencer
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Holder et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jermaine T Washington
Defendant:
Barret Holder and Ludi Leitch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger (ID 126377) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Kimberley S. Younger
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles (ID 122198) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Kora L. Liles
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott (PS) v. CJC et al
as 1:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
CJC, El Paso County and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett (ID 122203) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lockett
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz (ID 124145) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Barbara Marie Frantz
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windom v. USA
as 1:2024cv01343
Petitioner:
Samuel Terraye Windom
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sollis (PS) v. Mesa County Sheriff
as 1:2024cv01368
Petitioner:
Scott Allan Sollis
Respondent:
Mesa County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson (PS) v. Claps
as 1:2024cv01366
Petitioner:
Anthony Dennis Grayson
Respondent:
Gene Claps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
