Cases 81 - 90 of 20,112
Pomeroy v. Utah State Bar, et al
as 24-4054
Plaintiff:
AMY POMEROY
Defendant:
UTAH STATE BAR, CHRYSTAL MANCUSO-SMITH, in her official capacity as 3rd Division Comissioner, Utah State Bar, MARK MORRIS, in his official capacity as 3rd Division Commissioner, Utah State Bar and others
Franklin v. Shue
as 6:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael Locke Franklin
Defendant:
Charles Daniel Shue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saxena v. Corinth, et al
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
MATTHEW CORINTH, ALASTAIR MCNIVEN, DANIELLE KAY KUNZE and others
McGee (PS) v. Arapahoe County et al
as 1:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Laura Jackson McGee
Defendant:
Arapahoe County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pollak v. Strong et al
as 1:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Lillian McKenzie Strong, Eyebabe LLC, Lillian Strong and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Pollak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alabi v. Vilsack
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Aliu Alabi
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Harris v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, John Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Barry Tucker
Defendant:
Tahlequah, City of and Matthew Frits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v Wyoming Governor et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Defendant:
Wyoming Governor, Gillette Mayor, Former Gillette City Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce B Williams and The Hypatian Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crownhart v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1208
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY CROWNHART
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, AURORA POLICE DEPT., MESA COUNTY COLORADO COURT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
