Cases 11 - 20 of 232
Craig v. True
as 23-1114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNELIUS KENYATTA CRAIG
Defendant / Appellee:
B. TRUE, Warden
Waters v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2022cv00926
Petitioner:
Joseph B Waters
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico and FNU Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson v. Rankins
as 4:2022cv00348
Petitioner:
Anthony B Henson, Sr
Respondent:
Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barclay v. Choate et al
as 1:2022cv01472
Petitioner:
Maurice Barclay
Respondent:
J. Choate, John Fabbricator, Mathew T. Albene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kanev v. United States, et al
as 22-1166
Petitioner / Appellant:
TSVETAN KANEV and TSVETAN KANEV KANEV
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICER OLEJNIZACK, Officer in charge, Aurora Processing Center, OFFICER SMITH, ICE Denver Field Office, Centennial and others
Collinge v. King
as 5:2022cv03095
Petitioner:
Adam B. Collinge
Respondent:
Scott King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Johnson
as 5:2022cv03076
Petitioner:
Darris Colton Thomas, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savery v. Peterson
as 22-3073
Petitioner / Appellant:
ONETH B. SAVERY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAZEL M. PETERSON
Lawton v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Theodoric B. Lawton
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savery (ID 100096) v. Peterson
as 5:2022cv03035
Petitioner:
Oneth B. Savery
Respondent:
Hazel M. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
