Cases 121 - 130 of 208
Rojem v. Workman
as 5:2010cv00172
Petitioner:
Richard Rojem
Respondent:
Randall G Workman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Selsor v. Workman, et al
as 09-5180
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL BASCOM SELSOR
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Eaton v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
as 2:2009cv00261
Petitioner:
Dale W Eaton
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Magnan v. Workman
as 6:2009cv00438
Petitioner:
David Brian Magnan
Respondent:
Randall Workman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Workman
as 5:2009cv01172
Petitioner:
Jared William Jones
Respondent:
Randall G Workman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stemple v. Workman
as 09-5097
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SHAUN STEMPLE
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Kell v. Turley
as 2:2007cv00359
Petitioner:
Troy Michael Kell, Troy Michael Kell, Troy Michael Kell and others
Respondent:
Steven Turley and Steven Turley
Movant:
Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Williams v. Workman
as 4:2009cv00164
Petitioner:
Jeremy Alan Williams
Defendant:
Randall Workman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Workman
as 5:2009cv00293
Petitioner:
Michael DeWayne Smith
Respondent:
Randall G Workman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alverson v. Workman
as 09-5000
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY D. ALVERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
