Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Jenkins, Jr v. O'Niel et al
as 1:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
Willis Earl Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Elizabeth O'Niel, FNU Rovencamp, El Paso County County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Sharon LNU
as 6:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
Jamontra D. Willis
Respondent:
Chaplin Sharon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jenkins v. O'Neil et al
as 2:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Willis Earl Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Elizabeth O'Neil, FNU Ravencomp, El Paso County Jail and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins, Jr v. O'Niel et al
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Willis Earl Jenkins, Jr
Defendant:
Elizabeth O'Niel, FNU Rovencamp, El Paso County Jail of Colorado Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. El Paso County Jail
as 1:2021cv03403
Plaintiff:
Willis Earl Jenkins
Defendant:
El Paso County Jail, Bill Elder (I), Ayyad (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Curtis et al
as 1:2021cv02991
Plaintiff:
Willis Earl Jenkins
Defendant:
Curtis, Burner and El Paso County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. True
as 1:2021cv02002
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Davis
Defendant:
B. True and Roger Huddleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Delarosa
as 1:2021cv00705
Plaintiff:
George Willis Wright, II
Defendant:
Matthew Robert Delarosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar et al v. Bidden et al
as 1:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Drew Weissman, Jessie Slaughter, Mitch McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Anthony Pacheco, Robert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Sol Vista Mental Health
as 1:2020cv02864
Defendant:
Sol Vista Mental Health
Plaintiff:
Jason Luther Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
