Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 23-7007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 22-7024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Hoover v. Magana
as 5:2021cv03198
Plaintiff:
DeMarcus A. Hoover
Defendant:
Christopher Magana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell v. Hininger et al
as 6:2019cv00302
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, James R. Ezell and James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cincotta, Gentry, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover Sr. v. Matevousian
as 1:2019cv02385
Plaintiff:
Larry Hoover and Larry Hoover Sr.
Defendant:
Amy Kelly, Andre Matevousian and Catherine Spitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ovesian et al v. Pelle
as 1:2018cv03080
Plaintiff:
Jensen Cash Ovesian, Robert Edward Martinez, John Zeigler Williams and others
Defendant:
Joseph K. Pelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2017cv02453
Plaintiff:
Larry Hoover
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, Kelly, Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv - Fed. Question - Bivens-Prisoner
Edmond v. Raemisch, et al
as 13-1514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SEAN EDMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLISON SWEENEY-HOOVER, TIM HAND, ANTHONY YOUNG and others
Ezell v. Wilkinson, et al
as 13-7074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. EZELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM WILKINSON, Warden, REBECCA ADAMS, MR. BAIRD, Fox AIF Unit Manager and others
Floyd v. Hoover et al
as 2:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Troy Mathew Floyd
Defendant:
Darin Hoover, Todd Gray, Lucas Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
