Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Aigbekaen (PS) v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv03079
Petitioner:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Respondent:
Joseph R. Biden, Dennis Mcdouods, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Garland, et al
as 23-1293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND, Atty. Gen., MICHAEL HOROWITZ, O.I.G., DEPT. OF H.H.S. and others
Crawford (PS) v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Glendon Scott Crawford
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01827
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept. of HHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia (PS) v. Ciolli et al.
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Wilson Wifred Luargas Garcia
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Merrick Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colley v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv02889
Plaintiff:
Terry Jerome Colley
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Collette S. Peters, C. Lepe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hashi v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv02564
Plaintiff:
Isaac Hashi
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Jeffrey Clark, Director of B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Garland
as 1:2022cv02398
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv02053
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Alexander, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv01618
Respondent:
Alexander, Immigration Control and Enforcement, Choate and others
Petitioner:
Dale J. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
