Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Kolak v. Arapahoe County et al
as 1:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Walter M.J. Kolak
Defendant:
Tyler Brown, Wellpath, HSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plutt v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02969
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Plutt
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., WELLPATH, LLC, El Paso County, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schulz v. Nicholson et al
as 5:2021cv03159
Plaintiff:
Trey Lee Schulz
Defendant:
Travis Nicholson, Bill Travis, Denise Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martens v. El Paso County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 1:2021cv01671
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Clayton Martens
Defendant:
Wellpath and El Paso County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Wellpath Inc, FNU Smith, Rita Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wellpath Medical Providers
as 1:2021cv00488
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical Providers, Arapahoe County Detention Facility, Micah Rhoad and others
Plaintiff:
Kimo A. Davis and David Kimo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigil v. WellPath Medical Services et al
as 1:2020cv02936
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Services and El Paso County
Plaintiff:
Vincent Vigil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scriven v. Sedgwick County Commissioners, Board of et al
as 5:2020cv03110
Defendant:
(fnu) Tucker, (fnu) Hayes, Sedgwick County Commissioners, Board of and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scriven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruski v. Wellpath
as 1:2020cv01042
Defendant:
Wellpath
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Pruski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Poindexter et al
as 1:2020cv01008
Defendant:
Poindexter, El Paso County Sheriff's Department and Wellpath
Plaintiff:
Walter M. Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
