Cases 1 - 10 of 322
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Gonzalez (PS) v. John Doe #1
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Scott v. Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shyesha Scott
Defendant:
Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority, Daylen Rivers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stauch (ID 129417) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Letecia Stauch
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus, Donna Hook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jolliff v. Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jolliff
Defendant:
Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eaves v. Kory, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
RODNEY DOUGLAS EAVES
Defendant:
MS. KORY, JERRY ROARK, DANNY SALAZAR and others
Rowland v. Matevousian, et al
as 23-1411
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN ROWLAND
Defendant:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Regional Director of the North Central Regional Office of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, WILLIAM TRUE, Warden of FCI Florence, SHARI HIMLIE, Health Service Administrator, FCI Florence; JOHN DOES 1-5; JANE DOES 1-5; and others
Lazos v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03259
Plaintiff:
Jose Daniel Lazos
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Jesse Howes, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
