Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tung Keng Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. CLMBR, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00432
Petitioner:
Tung Keng Enterprise Co., LTD d/b/a DK City Co., Ltd. and Tung Keng Enterprise Co., Ltd. doing business as DK City Co., Ltd.
Respondent:
CLMBR, Inc. and Interactive Strength Inc. doing business as Forme
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0202 - Award Under Convention on Foreign Arbitral Awards
Bethany Nursing and Rehab Center, LLC v. Amaro
as 1:2022cv03138
Plaintiff:
Bethany Nursing and Rehab Center, LLC d/b/a Bethany Nursing and Rehab and Bethany Nursing and Rehab Center, LLC doing business as Bethany Nursing and Rehab Center
Defendant:
Jose Amara, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Manuela Morones, Deceased, Jose Amaro and Jose (I) Amaro
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4 Federal Arbitration Act
Pope v. Integrated Associates of Denver, Inc., The et al
as 1:2021cv02081
Plaintiff:
Ryan B. Pope
Defendant:
Integrated Associates of Denver, Inc, The and Integrated Associates, Inc, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wicker v. Bayview Loan Services et al
as 4:2019cv00088
Petitioner:
James B. Wicker
Respondent:
Bayview Loan Services and US Bank
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001
Integrated Associates of Denver, Inc., The et al v. Pope
as 1:2019cv01662
Petitioner:
Integrated Associates, Inc., The and Integrated Associates of Denver, Inc., The
Respondent:
Ryan B. Pope
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
OEC Medical Systems v. Pacific Imaging Technologies et al
as 2:2018cv00324
Petitioner:
OEC Medical Systems
Respondent:
Pacific Imaging Technologies and Scott B. Sweet
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001
Chaudhary v. Orthopaedic & Reconstructive Center Inc
as 5:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
Saad B Chaudhary
Defendant:
Orthopaedic & Reconstructive Center Inc
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
OrbitCom v. Qwest Communication
as 13-1136
Petitioner - Appellant:
ORBITCOM, INC
Respondent - Appellee:
QWEST COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LLC, d/b/a CENTURYLINK QCC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
