Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States v. Bynum
as 24-5061
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMANDA NICOLE BYNUM
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, G T Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zoellner et al v. Bynum et al
as 4:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Bruce Dart, Tulsa Department of Health, The, City of Tulsa, The and others
Plaintiff:
James J DeCristofaro, Clay Clark, Robert Zoellner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Brown v. Bradley, et al
as 20-5063
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA BRADLEY, DAVID PATRICK, DENNIS SEMLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE BROWN, JR.
Wilson v. Reid, et al
as 20-5015
Defendant / Appellee:
G. T. BYNUM, individually and official capacity, Mayor of City of Tulsa, OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF STATE, Office of, STANLEY GLANTZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SILAS WILSON, JR.
In re: Portnov
as 19-4105
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., Director, STEVEN C. HOUGH, Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
ABRAHAM PORTNOV
Portnov v. United States Dept of Justice, et al
as 19-4057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM PORTNOV
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEBORAH A. BYNUM, Assistant Director, CHAD READLER, Acting Assistant Attorney General and others
Wilson v. Reid, et al
as 19-5017
Defendant / Appellee:
G. T. BYNUM, individually and official capacity, Mayor of City of Tulsa, OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF STATE, Office of, STANLEY GLANTZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SILAS WILSON, JR.
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-5002
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISSA PREBLE HUTTER, DAVID BEEN, MARK KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDE LEE SAMUELS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
