Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Grant, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6129
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. GRANT, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIUS D. JONES, DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Defendant:
STEVE BURRAGE, EDWARD EVANS, Warden, KEVIN J. GROSS and others
Lay, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Not Yet Classified:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALEXANDER DAVIS, SHELTON D. JACKSON, JULIUS D. JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ABOUTANAA EL HABTI, Warden, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, in her official capacity, SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC, in his official capacity, RANDY CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOE M. ALLBAUGH, IV TEAM LEADER, IV TEAM MEMBERS#1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae:
ALL NON-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT WADE LAW
Glossip, et al v. Gross, et al
as 19-6002
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL W. ROACH, DIANNE B. OWENS, LAURA PITTMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALFRED B. MITCHELL, JOHN M. GRANT, BENJAMIN R. COLE, by and through his next friend Robert S. Jackson and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
WADE LAY
In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation
as 2:2014md02591
Plaintiff:
Eagle-View Dairy, LLC, Michael D. Tiede, Frank Hagenmaier and others
Petitioner:
Law Offices of Michael Miller, PC, Call & Gentry Law Group, LLC, Gellhaus & Gellhaus, PC and others
Other:
Harry G. Barber, Jr. and Sharon Brunet
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Syngenta Crop Protection AG
Defendant:
Bunge North America, Inc.
Interested Party:
Nolan Law Group and Lowe Eklund Wakefield Co., LPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1407
Big Tex Trailer Manufacturing et al v. Weaver et al
as 6:2013mc00013
Plaintiff:
Big Tex Trailer Manufacturing and Richard Baker
Defendant:
Urian Weaver , Josh Alm , Ronald D. Jackson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
